Kleiman D G 1977 Monogamy in Mammals Quarterly Review of Biology 5239ã¢â‚¬â€œ69
Research of Mating System in Tupaia belangeri by Microsatellite DNA Markers
Citation :- Research of Mating Organization in Tupaia belangeri by Microsatellite Dna Markers.Indian Journal of Animal Research.2020.(54):1098-1102
Accost : Key Laboratory of Ecological Adaptive Development and Conservation on Animals-Plants in Southwest Mountain Ecosystem of Yunnan Province Higher Institutes College, School of Life Science of Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China.
Submitted Appointment : xviii-09-2019
Accepted Date : xviii-03-2020
Abstract
Mating system of a population refers to the full general behavioral strategies which employed in obtaining mates. In society to investigate the genetic parentage of 151 individuals in Tupaia belangeri from Haikou Forest Farm, 8 microsatellite loci with higher polymorphic characters were used for genetic relationship analysis. The results showed that the number of alleles per polymorphic locus in 151 individuals ranged from 2 to ix. The average observed and expected heterozygosities per locus ranged from 0.2476 to 0.8367 and from 0.2789 to 0.7773, respectively. While the polymorphic data content ranged from 0.2469 to 0.7773. Except the locus (TBC1) deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, the others 7 microsatellite loci were employed to enquiry the mating system in T. belangeri, which establish that not-strictly monogamous in T. belangeri, only exhibited evidence of multiple paternity. All of the results suggested that characteristics of viii microsatellite loci provide an splendid tool for the inquiry of mating systems and fine-scaled population structuring of tree shrew, which was the first molecular evidence for mating system in T. belangeri.
Keywords
Extra-pair paternity Mating system Microsatellite DNA Tupaia belangeriReferences
- Capy, P. and Brookfield, J.F.Y. (1991) Estimation of relatedness in natural populations using highly polymorphic genetic markers. Genetics Selection Evolution. 23: 391-406.
- Carter, C., Devries, A. and Getz, L. (1995) Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neuro- -science and Biobehavioral Reviews. 19: 303–314.
- Cheverud, J.M., Dow, M.G. and Leutenegger, Due west. (1985). The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in torso weight among primates. Evolution. 39: 1335–1351.
- Collins, P.Yard. and Tsang, Westward.N. (1987) Growth and reproductive development in the male person tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) from birth to sexual maturity. Biological science of Reproduction. 37: 261–267.
- Collins, P.M., Tsang, West.N. and Lofts, B. (1982). Anatomy and function of the reproductive tract in the captive male tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). Biological science of Reproduction. 1: 169-182.
- Dixson, A. (2005) Mating systems and strategies. American Journal of Human Biology. 17: 390-391.
- Emlen, S. and Oring, L. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 197: 215-223.
- Jing, X.Fifty., Wang, Ten.X. and Wang, W.G. (2011). Isolation of micro- -satellite markers in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri chinensis). Acta Laboratorium Animalis Scientia Sinica. xix: 312–315.
- Kawamichi, T. and Kawamichi, Chiliad. (1979). Spatial organization and territory of 3 shrews (Tupaia glis). Animal Behaviour. 27: 381–393.
- Kawamichi, T. and Kawamichi, K. (1982). Social system and independence of offspring in tree shrews. Primates. 23: 189–205.
- Kleiman, D.G. and Malcolm, J.R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 52: 39–68.
- Kleiman, D.K. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biological science. 52: 39–45.
- Liu, Ten.H. and Yao, Y.G. (2013). Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers in the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis). Zoological Enquiry. 34: E62–E68.
- Martin, R. (1966). Tree shrews: unique reproductive mechanism of systematic importance. Science. 152: 1402–1404.
- Martin, R. (1968). Reproduction and ontogeny in treeshrews (Tupaia belangeri), with reference to their general behaviour and taxonomic relationships. Zeitschrift fuer Tierpsychologie. 25: 409–532.
- Miño, C.I., Russello, M.A., Mussi Gonçalves, P.F. and Del Lama, S.Due north. (2011). Reconstructing genetic mating systems in the absence of parental data in colonially breeding waterbirds. BMC Evolutionary Biological science. 11: 196.
- Reynolds, J.D. (1996) Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 11: 68–72.
- Schwaier, A. (1973) Convenance tupaias (Tupaia belangeri) in captivity. Zeitschrift Fur Versuchstierkunde. 15: 251–255.
- Schwaier, A. (1974). Muzzle for the successful maintenance of tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri) in captivity. Zeitschrift Fur Versuchstierkunde. 16: 337-340.
- Selolo, T.C., Mashiloane, K.L., Norris, D., Ng'ambi, J.Westward. and Dark-brown, D. (2015). Morphological differentiation of ethnic goats in different agro-ecological zones of Vhembe commune, Limpopo province, South Africa. Indian Journal of Animal Inquiry. 49: 527–531.
- Sinha, B., Mandal, K.G., Kumari, R, Kumari, A. and Gonge, D.Southward. (2018). Genetic touch on on external and internal egg quality traits of Vanaraja and Gramapriya birds and their crosses in Bihar. Indian Journal of Fauna Research. 52: 953–958.
- Slate, J., Marshall, T. and Pemberton, J. (2000). A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference programme cervus. Molecular Ecology. 9: 801–808.
- Sorenson, M.W. and Conaway, C.H. (1966). Observations on the social behavior of tree shrews in captivity. Folia Primato- -logica. four: 124-145.
- Wang, Z.K., Sunday, R.Y., Li, Q.F. and Fang, J.M. (1994). Characteristics of the resting metabolic rate of tree shrew, Tupaia belangeri. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science). xxx: 408-414.
- Zhu, W.L., Ren, X.Y., Hou, D.M., Wang, W.Q. and Wang, Z.One thousand. (2019) Analysis of volatile chemical substances in urine of the kinship and non-kinship Tupaia belangeri (Mammalia: Scandentia: Tupaiidae). Indian Journal of Animal Inquiry. 53: 311-320.
Source: https://www.arccjournals.com/journal/indian-journal-of-animal-research/B-1201
0 Response to "Kleiman D G 1977 Monogamy in Mammals Quarterly Review of Biology 5239ã¢â‚¬â€œ69"
Post a Comment